I try to help others just like you and I try to give Line 6 products a justice.
I don't want to drop Helix which I think is the good piece of hardware I have learned to use. Instead of scraping their heads or modding they drop their tools and buy another. They often can not name phenomenons of their tools they do not like.
SIMPLE DELAY SOFTWARE
Although I do not find playing with laptop to be convinient enough only for a possibility to use some particular software quality I lack in Helix. Now I have to pick other solutions for my needs. I hope someone at Line 6 cares about development of better quality software, not only of a new kind like polyphonic pitch shifting but also that "ain't broke" but left behind competition for several years. In this topic I just want to point some weeknesses and what I am focusing in to pick creative signal processing tools for myself. You perfectly know "what ain't broke don't fix it", so every introduced model have to stay or eventually be moved to the legacy section. I don’t suspect they’ll be adding additional parameters to existing effects It’s not really so much about being a fanboy as much as having your personal preferences constantly criticized. The reason people get offended is that describe something they personally like as crap. I just think if they were constantly fiddling with existing stuff, it would prevent them adding the new stuff. I don’t suspect they’ll be adding additional parameters to existing effects, at not that much. I’m not sure how you can Line 6 is saying what they have is the best hey can offer when they’re constantly adding new features. The Victoria guys were hired perhaps as far back as 2018, IIRC. To make polyphonic pitch shifting the qualified team was hired in 2020 so I don't buy "we did our best years ago and there is nothing we can offer you" justification and army of Line 6 fanboys advocating it. I also do not appeciate Helix fanboys taking any criticism as a personal offense.Īnd seriously - Legacy models were written 15, Helix reverbs 3 years ago. Mistress models, lack of NOS tape delay shape, overtfiltered BBD delay models, reverbs, noishaped low bit vintage digital delays and the manual. The last question to Line 6 devs is: why not let the users to use feedback above 100% to make pedal controlled "dub" oscilations?Įverything except CE-1, EHX El. So what about Dumb Delay? The delay that does not alter the sound at all or alters it if desired with selectable simple EQ curves? It sounds like noiseshapping is used?) Why? (EDIT: I have been listening to it for 20min. They are crushed once and remain constant forever. The repetitions are not fed back to 8 bit "crusher". Boss DD2 was the signal was fed back to poor 12 bit AD converter at very low sampling rate and therefore it was degrading with each repetition. This is supposed to be modeled with Vintage Digital so why alter the sound in Simple Delay? BTW, while checking Vintage Delay I switched to 8 bits and the same behavior takes place. The fun with early digital delays like eg. Good but what I hear it does not feed back the crushed/filtered signal. The feedback goes to 100% which means at that value it gives infinite repetitions. Line 6 developer has decided that its repetitions are somewhat "modeled" or "bit crushed" and little bit low pass filtered. There is nothing simpler than Simple Delay, right? Actually no. Let's talk about Simple Delay vs Vintage Delay.
0 kommentar(er)
